Re: PostgreSQL Audit Extension
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL Audit Extension |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160219155417.GA89807@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL Audit Extension (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL Audit Extension
Re: PostgreSQL Audit Extension |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Understood. My point is that there is a short list of read events, and > many DDL events. We have already hesitated to record DDL changes for > logical replication because of the code size, maintenance overhead, and > testing required. DDL is already captured using the event triggers mechanism (which is what it was invented for in the first place). The only thing we don't have is a hardcoded mechanism to transform it from C struct format to SQL language. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: