Re: Idle In Transaction Session Timeout, revived
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Idle In Transaction Session Timeout, revived |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160204201911.flztccu5vqjt2hyo@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Idle In Transaction Session Timeout, revived (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-02-04 22:24:50 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > But, IIRC, one of the problems that prevent the adoption of this feature is > the addition of gettimeofday() call after every SQL command receipt. > Have you already resolved that problem? Or we don't need to care about > it because it's almost harmless? Well, it only happens when the feature is enabled, not unconditionally. So I don't think that's particularly bad, as long as the feature is not enabled by default. If we feel we need to something about the gettimeofday() call at some point, I think it'd made a lot of sense to introduce a more centralize "statement stop" time, and an extended pgstat_report_activity() that allows to specify the timestamp. Because right now we'll essentially do gettimeofday() calls successively when starting a command, starting a transaction, committing a transaction, and finishing a comment. That's pretty pointless. Andres
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: