"using previous checkpoint record at" maybe not the greatest idea?
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | "using previous checkpoint record at" maybe not the greatest idea? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160201235854.GO8743@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: "using previous checkpoint record at" maybe not the
greatest idea?
Re: "using previous checkpoint record at" maybe not the greatest idea? Re: "using previous checkpoint record at" maybe not the greatest idea? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, currently if, when not in standby mode, we can't read a checkpoint record, we automatically fall back to the previous checkpoint, and start replay from there. Doing so without user intervention doesn't actually seem like a good idea. While not super likely, it's entirely possible that doing so can wreck a cluster, that'd otherwise easily recoverable. Imagine e.g. a tablespace being dropped - going back to the previous checkpoint very well could lead to replay not finishing, as the directory to create files in doesn't even exist. As there's, afaics, really no "legitimate" reasons for needing to go back to the previous checkpoint I don't think we should do so in an automated fashion. All the cases where I could find logs containing "using previous checkpoint record at" were when something else had already gone pretty badly wrong. Now that obviously doesn't have a very large significance, because in the situations where it "just worked" are unlikely to be reported... Am I missing a reason for doing this by default? Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: