Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq
Дата
Msg-id 20160127125421.GA642827@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq  (Yury Zhuravlev <u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru>)
Ответы Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq  (Yury Zhuravlev <u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Yury Zhuravlev wrote:

> If so many problems with MSVC can discard his support of Postgres?

That doesn't sound likely.  Keep in mind that users might want to
compile extension modules, and not everyone is going to use mingw for
that.  As far as I know, stuff compiled with MSVC is not compatible with
mingw compiled objects.  So even if the main packages switched to
compiling with mingw, we'd probably still want to support MSVC.

> Under windows we can use MinGW64/Msys or LLVM/Clang for MSVC.

I'm guessing that LLVM/Clang port would be useful for something, but I'm
not clear what.

Are we moving forward with the CMake stuff?  It would be *awesome* to
get rid of the MSVC build scripts, and perhaps we can move forward on
some smaller items such as PGDLLEXPORT markings as well.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq
Следующее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq