Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160127125421.GA642827@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq (Yury Zhuravlev <u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq
Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Yury Zhuravlev wrote: > If so many problems with MSVC can discard his support of Postgres? That doesn't sound likely. Keep in mind that users might want to compile extension modules, and not everyone is going to use mingw for that. As far as I know, stuff compiled with MSVC is not compatible with mingw compiled objects. So even if the main packages switched to compiling with mingw, we'd probably still want to support MSVC. > Under windows we can use MinGW64/Msys or LLVM/Clang for MSVC. I'm guessing that LLVM/Clang port would be useful for something, but I'm not clear what. Are we moving forward with the CMake stuff? It would be *awesome* to get rid of the MSVC build scripts, and perhaps we can move forward on some smaller items such as PGDLLEXPORT markings as well. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: