Re: Segfault in MemoryContextAlloc
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Segfault in MemoryContextAlloc |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160127103533.GA17919@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Segfault in MemoryContextAlloc (Dmitriy Sarafannikov <dimon99901@mail.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re[2]: [BUGS] Segfault in MemoryContextAlloc
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Hi, On 2016-01-27 13:24:35 +0300, Dmitriy Sarafannikov wrote: > Hi, i caught segfault with a simple select query (column and table names in query were changed). > select id_pk2 from table1 where id_pk1 = '9751302' > > primary key is (id_pk1, id_pk2) > table1 is (id_pk1 bigint, id_pk2 bigint, date_add timestamp) > (gdb) bt full > #0 MemoryContextAlloc (context=0x0, size=120) at /build/postgresql-9.4-MZhK6O/postgresql-9.4-9.4.5/build/../src/backend/utils/mmgr/mcxt.c:584 > No locals. > #1 0x00007f6ecc5b8eec in AfterTriggerBeginXact () at /build/postgresql-9.4-MZhK6O/postgresql-9.4-9.4.5/build/../src/backend/commands/trigger.c:3913 > No locals. > #2 0x00007f6ecc4e8c21 in StartTransaction () at /build/postgresql-9.4-MZhK6O/postgresql-9.4-9.4.5/build/../src/backend/access/transam/xact.c:1848 > s = 0x7f6eccbc4480 <TopTransactionStateData> > #3 StartTransactionCommand () at /build/postgresql-9.4-MZhK6O/postgresql-9.4-9.4.5/build/../src/backend/access/transam/xact.c:2534 > s = 0x7f6eccbc4480 <TopTransactionStateData> > __func__ = "StartTransactionCommand" That's, uh, weird. TopTransactionContext should never be NULL here. This is with a stock 9.4.5, without any further extensions configured? My best guess is that some cache invalidation callback did something invalid. With AtStart_Inval(); AtStart_Cache(); AfterTriggerBeginXact(); in StartTransaction(), AtStart_Inval() still had a valid TopTransactionContext, but AfterTriggerBeginXact() didn't anymore, that seems like a good guess. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: