Oliver Elphick wrote:
> (Replying to the digest post)
>
> Having watched this discussion from the start, I think the project
> would be better off without any CoC. The list has always been
> conducted well and if something isn't broken you shouldn't try to fix
> it.
FWIW, I agree that we don't need a CoC.
However, those of us who have never been attacked/abused would naturally
state that there have never been any attacks/abuses, and I believe
that's false -- in other words I believe some people would consider
themselves to have been attacked/abused, even if some external observers
might not necessarily agree that they were being attacked/abused.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services