Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160118214701.GQ31313@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 02:24:46PM -0800, Joe Conway wrote: > On 01/16/2016 06:02 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote: > >> 1) Change NextXID output format from "%u/%u" to "%u:%u" > >> (see recent hackers thread) > > > > ! printf(_("Latest checkpoint's NextXID: %u/%u\n"), > > ControlFile.checkPointCopy.nextXidEpoch, > > ControlFile.checkPointCopy.nextXid); > > printf(_("Latest checkpoint's NextOID: %u\n"), > > --- 646,652 ---- > > ControlFile.checkPointCopy.ThisTimeLineID); > > printf(_("Latest checkpoint's full_page_writes: %s\n"), > > ControlFile.checkPointCopy.fullPageWrites ? _("on") : _("off")); > > ! printf(_("Latest checkpoint's NextXID: %u:%u\n"), > > This should be definitely a separate patch. > > Ok. Notwithstanding Simon's reply, there seems to be consensus that this > is the way to go. Will commit it this way unless some additional > objections surface in the next day or so. FYI, this slash-colon change will break pg_upgrade unless it is patched. Dp you want a patch from me? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: