Re: BYTEA
От | Karsten Hilbert |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BYTEA |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160118100507.GA23017@hermes.hilbert.loc обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BYTEA (Cat <cat@zip.com.au>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 11:25:43AM +1100, Cat wrote: > On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 07:33:38PM +0000, Eugene Yin wrote: > > Pg 9.4+ > > Storing binary data using bytea or text data types > > - Pluses > > - Storing and Accessing entry utilizes the same interface when accessing any other data type or record. > > - No need to track OID of a "large object" you create > > > > - Minus > > > > - bytea and text data type both use TOAST (details here) > > - limited to 1G per entry > > - 4 Billion (> 2KB) entries per table max. > > > > - Need to escape/encode binary data before sending to DB then do the reverse after retrieving the data > > - Memory requirements on the server can be steep even on a small record set. > > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/BinaryFilesInDB > > Would http://multicorn.org/foreign-data-wrappers/#idfilesystem-foreign-data-wrapper be of greater use? It would certainly be of use to add that option to the aforementioned wiki page. Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ eu.pool.sks-keyservers.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: