Re: Speedup twophase transactions
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Speedup twophase transactions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160112155646.GA815006@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Speedup twophase transactions (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Speedup twophase transactions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > Should we just move the code somewhere just to imply it is generic? Seems > > pointless refactoring to me. > > Er, why not xlogutils.c? Having the 2PC code depending directly on > something that is within logicalfuncs.c is weird. Yes, I agree with Michael -- it's better to place code in its logical location than keep it somewhere else just because historically it was there. That way, future coders can find the function more easily. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: