Re: Improving replay of XLOG_BTREE_VACUUM records

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 8 January 2016 at 13:36, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

> > I would agree except for the observation on toast indexes.  I think
> > that's an important enough use case that perhaps we should have both.
> 
> The exclusion of toast indexes is something we can remove also, I have
> recently discovered. When we access toast data we ignore MVCC, but we still
> have the toast pointer and chunkid to use for rechecking our scan results.
> So a later patch will add some rechecks.

Ah, interesting, glad to hear.  I take it you're pushing your patch
soon, then?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services