Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches
От | andres@anarazel.de |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20160105155326.GC7650@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016-01-05 10:48:43 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 04:42:24PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote: > > On 2016-01-05 10:40:13 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 04:31:15PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote: > > > > On 2016-01-05 10:28:25 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > Yes? But it's ok sizewise on the common platforms? > > > > > > What is the uncommon part? I guess I missed that. > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20151212181702.GH17938%40alap3.anarazel.de > > Yes, I saw that, and the URL in the email, but what is the uncommon > case? Are you asking which platforms s_lock is larger than a char? If so, grep s_lock.h for typedefs. If not, I'm not following what you're asking for?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: