On 2016-01-04 10:35:12 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> If we don't know of a specific problem that would be fixed by
> back-patching this commit to pre-9.5 branches, and it seems like we
> don't, then I don't really see much upside to back-patching it. I
> mean, yeah, we think that this is wrong because we think we know that
> the behavior of Windows is different than what we thought when the
> code was written. But if we were wrong then, we could be wrong now,
> too. If so, it would be better to only have broken 9.5.
I think it always was just a typo, given code a few lines down in the
same function, added by the same commit, treated that case differently.
Anyway, I don't have a particularly strong opinion here, so ...