Re: unused_oids?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: unused_oids? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20152.1169741772@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | unused_oids? (Gevik Babakhani <pgdev@xs4all.nl>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gevik Babakhani <pgdev@xs4all.nl> writes: > At this moment the following is the list of the unused OIDs. For the > uuid datatype I use a script for generating catalog entries. I can close > some gaps there if the "masters" are okay with this. Are any OIDs > reserved for later or any range can be used in this case? My advice is not to try to fill in the gaps --- better to leave them there so that if any other objects are created that're related to the nearby ones, they can be assigned nearby OIDs. If you've got a patch that is going to use a bunch of OIDs for related purposes, it's better to use a contiguous chunk of OIDs for it. I believe that the bitmap-indexing patch is using OIDs starting at 3000 (at least that's the advice I gave them awhile back). If you need less than 50 you might start at 2950, else check that patch and start above whatever they used. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: