Re: [PROPOSAL] Backup and recovery of pg_statistic
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PROPOSAL] Backup and recovery of pg_statistic |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20151231191733.GH4360@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PROPOSAL] Backup and recovery of pg_statistic (Dmitry Ivanov <d.ivanov@postgrespro.ru>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 05:28:11PM +0300, Dmitry Ivanov wrote: > Suppose you want to upgrade from 9.4 to 9.6. In that case you would use the > pg_upgrade utility provided by the release 9.6, which means that it's the > pg_dump who would have to connect to the older instance and to prepare tuples > to be inserted to the pg_statistic of the newer instance. The pg_dump utility > would have to convert statistical data to the new format (for example, add > placeholders for new columns), so generated INSERT statements would be fine > provided that the pg_dump would be up-to-date. > > The documentation states that we should always run the pg_upgrade binary of > the new server, not the old one [http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/ > pgupgrade.html, Usage, #9]. This means that the pg_upgrade will definitely use > a fresh version of pg_dump utility that is aware of all possible pitfalls. > > Furthermore, each INSERT statement consists of textually-serialized columns of > pg_statistic. Columns of 'anyarray' type are deserialized using the 'array_in' > procedure which performs various sanity checks, including the element type > check. Thus it is not possible to insert an anyarray object which will cause > server death. My idea was to do the insert via a function, with a version number at the head: SELECT pg_stats_insert('1.0', '{row value}'); When the pg_stats format is changed, the version number is bumped. The backend would know the pg_stats version it supports and either remap or ignore pg_stats_insert() calls for older versions. To get more complicated, you could have a version number for data types too and just invalidate inserts for data type format changes, rather than requiring the entire pg_stats version to be bumped. I am not sure how we would consistently record the data type name. pg_upgrade preserves pg_type.oid, so that would work for it, but pg_type.oid is not preserved for non-pg_upgrade usage of non-builtin data types. For those cases, I guess the type name would be sufficient. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: