Re: Making tab-complete.c easier to maintain

Michael Paquier wrote:

> OK, here are new patches.
> - 0001 switches a bunch of TailMatches to Matches. Do we want to care
> about the case where a schema is created following by a bunch of
> objects? I mean stuff like "CREATE SCHEMA hoge CREATE TABLE ..." where
> the current completion would work fine. The performance gains seem
> worth it compared to the number of people actually using it, the point
> has just not been raised yet.

I'd rather have the completion work for that case than get a few
microseconds speedup.  As far as I recall, it's only four commands that
must retain the old coding.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services