Re: On columnar storage (2)

Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Could we get this rebased past the merge of the parallel execution commits?
> 
> +1. Alvaro, Tomas, Simon, what are the next plans with those patches?

Yeah, I've been working intermittently on getting the whole tree rebased
and squashed, because after the last submission we made a lot of
progress.  I'll repost later.  I think it should be marked "returned
with feedback" for now.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services