Re: Remaining 9.5 open items
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Remaining 9.5 open items |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20151130220806.GD2763@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Remaining 9.5 open items (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Remaining 9.5 open items
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost wrote: > The non-documentation question is around DROP OWNED. We need to either > have policies dropped by DROP OWNED (well, roles removed, unless it's > the last one, in which case the policy should be dropped), or update the > documentation to reflect that they don't. I had been thinking we'd > fix DROP OWNED to deal with the policies, but if folks feel it's too > late for that kind of a change, then we can simply document it. I don't > believe that's unreasonable for a new feature and we can work to get it > addressed in 9.6. DROP OWNED is documented as a mechanism to help you drop the role, so it should do whatever is needed for that. I don't think documenting the fact that it leaves the user as part of policies is good enough. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: