Re: WIP: About CMake v2
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: About CMake v2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20151126164216.GA2521@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP: About CMake v2 (YUriy Zhuravlev <u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Re: WIP: About CMake v2 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-11-26 19:22:23 +0300, YUriy Zhuravlev wrote: > On Thursday 26 November 2015 11:10:36 you wrote: > > Adding a new build > > dependency is bad enough; adding one that isn't easily available is a > > show-stopper. > > If someone decided to compile from source Postgres rather than install from > RPM then it will not be a problem as to build CMake. Packages have to be built from something, and usually it's desirable that all dependencies are from within the distribution. I don't think you'll have much success pushing back on this. > It is possible to make support for CMake 2.6 but now is not the time when you > have to think about it. I'll come back to this when all the functionality will > work. No point in doing any work if you don't agree with the basic prerequisites.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: