Re: BUG #13757: Able to write to postgres even when the main process has been killed
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #13757: Able to write to postgres even when the main process has been killed |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20151106164254.GB6104@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | BUG #13757: Able to write to postgres even when the main process has been killed (vijaysam@mailworks.org) |
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
vijaysam@mailworks.org wrote: > But, when I try to kill -9 the master server main postgres process. The > client code from java is able to continue to write to the postgres db which > was the old master as there was a connection established to this server and > the connection keeps allowing write to happen as thought the server is still > running. I understand kill -9 is a bad thing. Good thing that you do. Don't do it, as it's not a proper shutdown procedure. There are three documented signals with varying degrees of shutdown immediacy: SIGTERM, SIGINT, SIGQUIT. The postmaster process will take action to terminate server processes as appropriate if you use those signals. SIGKILL is entirely inappropriate. If you would like to use SIGKILL, you need to send it to *all* postgres processes, which will cause a shutdown very similar in nature to SIGQUIT. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: