Re: BUG #13750: Autovacuum slows down with large numbers of tables. More workers makes it slower.
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #13750: Autovacuum slows down with large numbers of tables. More workers makes it slower. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20151030134646.GE5726@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #13750: Autovacuum slows down with large numbers of tables. More workers makes it slower. (daveg@sonic.net) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #13750: Autovacuum slows down with large numbers of
tables. More workers makes it slower.
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
daveg@sonic.net wrote: > With more than a few tens of thousands of tables in one database > autovacuuming slows down radically and becomes ineffective. Increasing the > number of autovacuum workers makes the slow down worse. Yeah, you need to decrease autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay if you want to make them go faster. (As more workers are started, the existing ones slow down. The intent is that the I/O bandwidth allocation is kept constant regardless of how many workers there are.) > When they updated to 9.4.4 they also increased the number of autovacuum > workers in anticipation of the multixact fix causing extra vacuuming. > Several days later they observed massive catalog bloat, eg pg_attribute was > over 200GB of mostly empty pages. This caused new connections to get stuck > in startup as the catalogs no longer fit in the buffer cache. Oh crap. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: