Re: Patch: Optimize memory allocation in function 'bringetbitmap'
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch: Optimize memory allocation in function 'bringetbitmap' |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20151016021334.GA3391@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch: Optimize memory allocation in function 'bringetbitmap' (zhangjinyu <beijing_pg@163.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch: Optimize memory allocation in function
'bringetbitmap'
Re: Patch: Optimize memory allocation in function 'bringetbitmap' |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
zhangjinyu wrote: > >>>>However I wonder if it would be simpler to have the dtup structure have > >>>>the pointers, so that you can pass it as NULL in the first call and then > >>>>followup calls reuse the one allocated in the first call. > Jinyu: the memory is allocated from perRangeCxt and perRangeCxt will be > reset in loop, > so this way don't work. You're right. I think we can do better: have brin_deform_tuple accept another argument of type BrinMemTuple *, which can be NULL. If NULL, the function calls brin_new_memtuple to allocate a new one (just like current code); if not NULL, that one is used. Have brin_new_memtuple also allocate the values/allnulls/hasnulls arrays, which are now part of the BrinMemTuple struct. Then, bringetbitmap calls brin_new_memtuple once before changing to perRangeCxt, then reuse the returned inside the loop (we probably need brin_memtuple_initialize to clear out the struct at the end of each loop iteration). Other callers of brin_deform_tuple just pass NULL to get the current behavior. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: