Re: Proposal: pg_confcheck - syntactic & semantic validation of postgresql configuration files
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: pg_confcheck - syntactic & semantic validation of postgresql configuration files |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20151014174553.GD4405@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal: pg_confcheck - syntactic & semantic validation of postgresql configuration files (Amir Rohan <amir.rohan@zoho.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal: pg_confcheck - syntactic & semantic validation of postgresql configuration files
Re: Proposal: pg_confcheck - syntactic & semantic validation of postgresql configuration files |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Amir Rohan wrote: > it does fail the "dependent options" test: > $ postgres -C "archive_mode" > on > $ postgres -C wal_level > minimal > > no errors, great, let's try it: > $ pg_ctl restart > > FATAL: WAL archival cannot be enabled when wal_level is "minimal" This complaint could be fixed we had a --check-config that runs the check hook for every variable, I think. I think that closes all the syntax checks you want; then your tool only needs to worry about semantic checks, and can obtain the values by repeated application of -C <param> (or, more conveniently, have a new -C mode that takes no args and prints the names and values for all parameters). -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: