Re: bugs and bug tracking
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bugs and bug tracking |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20151013184140.GB7842@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: bugs and bug tracking ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: bugs and bug tracking
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 08:39:16AM -0700, Joshua Drake wrote: > On 10/13/2015 08:15 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > >Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > >>On 2015-10-13 16:21:54 +0200, �lvaro Hern�ndez Tortosa wrote: > >>>(50 chars for the commit summary, 72 chars line wrapping) > > > >>-1 - imo 50 chars too often makes the commit summary too unspecific, > >>requiring to read much more. > > > >I agree --- I have a hard enough time writing a good summary in 75 > >characters. 50 would be awful. > > The idea of writing a commit message that is useful in a number of > characters that is less than half a tweet sounds unbearable. The > idea of trying to discern what the hell a commit actually is in a > number of characters that is less than half a tweet sounds > completely ridiculous. > > -1 on that particular aspect. FYI, I think we already have two limits for the first line summary of commit messages. The limits are 64 for commit message subjects and 50 characters for gitweb summary pages --- anything longer is truncated. My commit template shows me the limits as I am typing the commit text to remind me of the limits: -- email subject limit ----------------------------------------- -- gitweb summary limit -------------------------- -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: