Re: bugs and bug tracking
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bugs and bug tracking |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20151007175252.GB3685@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: bugs and bug tracking (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: bugs and bug tracking
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Stephen Frost (sfrost@snowman.net) wrote: > Perhaps it'd be better to have pgsql-bugs be the "Package owner", who > also gets emails about bug activity on their packages. That way, we > could have a 'jdbc' package whose owner is pgsql-jdbc and pgsql-bugs > wouldn't end up with that bug traffic (which, I believe, is what we'd > want...). To clarify, I mean 'Maintainer', and this would be identical to how the PostgreSQL packages in Debian are currently maintained: Maintainers for postgresql are Debian PostgreSQL Maintainers <pkg-postgresql-public@lists.alioth.debian.org>. And, handily, that list is archived here: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-postgresql-public/ One example of how it's used can be seen with this thread: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-postgresql-public/2015-September/002803.html Thanks! Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: