Re: bugs and bug tracking
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bugs and bug tracking |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20151007144034.GT3685@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: bugs and bug tracking (Nathan Wagner <nw+pg@hydaspes.if.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: bugs and bug tracking
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Nathan Wagner (nw+pg@hydaspes.if.org) wrote: > I think I have suggested that there be a way to generate a bug id via > email. Presumably someone could just copy that email address to make a > not-tracked discussion get a bug id. If the system archived all the > lists (not hard) it would be possible to pull the other emails from the > thread into the bug (also not hard). As for marking as 'not-a-bug' > this can easily be done via whatever mechanism might be used. > Something along the lines of: > > Bug Status: not a bug If we're providing control messages through email (which I absolutely believe needs to be supported), I'd strongly prefer that they be easy to write. The above isn't. A good set of commands to support can be seen here: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control The way debbugs currently works, which I like, is that you email NNNN-done@bugs.debian.org (NNNN being the bug #) and that automatically closes the bug and that email is sent to the bug reporter. Generally, this will be in a reply to an email which came from, or at least CC'd, NNNN@bugs.debian.org, so changing the address to go to -done is quite easy. An example would go something like: Initial email: ----------- From: 1234@bugs.postgresql.org [...] PG should do X ----------- Reply email: ----------- From: sfrost@snowman.net To: 1234-done@bugs.postgresql.org, control@bugs.postgresql.org tag 1234 wontfix thanks Blah, blah, this is why we don't consider this a bug ----------- Currently with debbugs (afaik, I can double-check with Don though), to actually add tags you have to email control@, which will read and process commands up until it finds a "thanks" or similar end-command. Since the email is going to control@, you have to specify which bug you're adding the tag to. Here's an example of how the system is used: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=100132 Using control@, etc, avoids having to figure out if a given email sent to NNN@bugs.postgresq.org has commands in it or not (all emails to control@ are assumed to have commands). Thanks! Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: