Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20151.1577127467@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 23:49 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Oh, interesting --- I hadn't been paying much attention to that thread. >> I'll compare your PoC there to what I did. > Actually, I should’ve said that your patch is much better attempt at > getting this in order, so there’s not much to see in my patch really. :) One thing I see is that you chose to relocate RelationGetPartitionDesc's declaration to partdesc.h, whereupon RelationBuildPartitionDesc doesn't have to be exported at all anymore. Perhaps that's a better factorization than what I did. It supposes that any caller of RelationGetPartitionDesc is going to need partdesc.h, but that seems reasonable. We could likewise move RelationGetPartitionKey to partcache.h. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: