Re: pg_resetxlog sentences
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_resetxlog sentences |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20150917153844.GX88970@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_resetxlog sentences (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Fujii Masao wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 5:00 AM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > Robert Haas wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br> wrote: > >> > While updating translations, I came across those almost similar sentences. > >> > > >> > pg_controldata.c > >> > > >> > 273 printf(_("Latest checkpoint's oldestCommitTs: %u\n"), > >> > 274 ControlFile.checkPointCopy.oldestCommitTs); > >> > > >> > pg_resetxlog.c > >> > > >> > 668 printf(_("Latest checkpoint's oldest CommitTs: %u\n"), > >> > 669 ControlFile.checkPointCopy.oldestCommitTs); > >> > 670 printf(_("Latest checkpoint's newest CommitTs: %u\n"), > >> > 671 ControlFile.checkPointCopy.newestCommitTs); > >> > > >> > To be consistent, let's change pg_resetxlog to mimic pg_controldata > >> > sentence. Patch is attached. It is new in 9.5 so backpatch is needed. > >> > >> Seems like a good idea to me. Anyone disagree? > > > > OK with me. > > +1 > > One relevant question is; why doesn't pg_controldata report newestCommitTs? Most likely an oversight. As I recall, we added newestCommitTs in a later version of the patch; we probably patched pg_controldata earlier and then failed to realize that we needed to add the new field. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: