Re: creating extension including dependencies

On 2015-09-16 19:46:10 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
> 
> > > @@ -91,8 +92,38 @@ CREATE EXTENSION [ IF NOT EXISTS ] <replaceable class="parameter">extension_name
> > >          The name of the schema in which to install the extension's
> > >          objects, given that the extension allows its contents to be
> > >          relocated.  The named schema must already exist.
> > > -        If not specified, and the extension's control file does not specify a
> > > -        schema either, the current default object creation schema is used.
> > > +        If not specified, and the extension control file does not define
> > > +        <literal>schema</> either, the current default object creation
> > > +        schema is used.
> > > +       </para>
> > 
> > Imo still a spurious change.
> 
> I think some more work is needed in this file -- ISTM the rules used to
> determine the creation schema under CASCADE should not be placed within
> the SCHEMA clause explanation.

Hm. Why not? Seems to make sense in the context of that page?

Greetings,

Andres Freund