Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20150916221210.GK2086@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-08-20 09:59:25 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Is there any significant interest in either of these? > > Josh Berkus tells me that he would like pg_controldata information, and I > was a bit interested in pg_config information, for this reason: I had a > report of someone who had configured using --with-libxml but the xml tests > actually returned the results that are expected without xml being > configured. The regression tests thus passed, but should not have. It > occurred to me that if we had a test like > > select pg_config('configure') ~ '--with-libxml' as has_xml; > > in the xml tests then this failure mode would be detected. On my reading of the thread there seems to be a tenative agreement that pg_controldata is useful and still controversy around pg_config. Can we split committing this? Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: