Re: security labels on databases are bad for dump & restore
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: security labels on databases are bad for dump & restore |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20150728190301.GE4726@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: security labels on databases are bad for dump & restore (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: security labels on databases are bad for dump & restore
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-07-28 14:58:26 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > Yes, I think we should make restoring the database's properties the > job of pg_dump and remove it completely from pg_dumpall, unless we can > find a case where that's really going to break things. CREATE DATABASE blarg; SECURITY LABEL ON blarg IS 'noaccess'; ALTER DATABASE blarg SET default_tablespace = space_with_storage; pg_restore -> SECURITY LABEL ON blarg IS 'allow_access'; -> ALTER DATABASE blarg SET default_tablespace = space_without_storage; That's probably not sufficient reasons not to go that way, but I do think there's a bunch more issues like that. At the very least all these need to be emitted as ALTER DATABASE current_database ... et al. Otherwise it's impossible to rename databases, which definitely would not be ok. Andres
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: