BUG #13493: pl/pgsql doesn't scale with cpus (PG9.3, 9.4)
От | grb@skogoglandskap.no |
---|---|
Тема | BUG #13493: pl/pgsql doesn't scale with cpus (PG9.3, 9.4) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20150707222739.1188.8068@wrigleys.postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #13493: pl/pgsql doesn't scale with cpus (PG9.3, 9.4)
Re: BUG #13493: pl/pgsql doesn't scale with cpus (PG9.3, 9.4) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 13493 Logged by: Graeme Bell Email address: grb@skogoglandskap.no PostgreSQL version: 9.3.9 Operating system: Linux Description: Hi, pl/pgsql doesn't scale properly on postgres 9.3/9.4 with multiple processors beyond 2-3 processors for me, regardless of the machine I use or the benchmark/project. I discovered this painfully during a project here where we were running a small 'forest simulator' in pl/pgsql on different datasets simultaneously. To highlight the problem, I've provided a benchmark that demonstrates two problems (on my machines). 1. The first problem is scaling when you have lots of pl/pgsql code running and doing real work. 2. The second problem is scaling when you have a table column as an input parameter. The benchmark results & source code are here: https://github.com/gbb/ppppt Another set of benchmarks showing the same phenomena on PG9.3 and PG9.4 can be found here, under 'BENCHMARKS.md' https://github.com/gbb/par_psql I would be grateful if others could run the benchmark and confirm/disconfirm the result. If confirmed, the result may be of special interest to e.g. the postgis & pgrouting communities. This result is from a 16-core machine with 128GB of memory and a lot of random I/O capacity (there's no writing involved though other than a bit of WAL, and not much data, so this shouldn't matter).
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: