Re: [CORE] back-branch multixact fixes & 9.5 alpha/beta: schedule
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [CORE] back-branch multixact fixes & 9.5 alpha/beta: schedule |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20150608194823.GQ133018@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [CORE] back-branch multixact fixes & 9.5 alpha/beta: schedule ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [CORE] back-branch multixact fixes & 9.5 alpha/beta:
schedule
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > On 06/08/2015 12:31 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > >Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > > >>If we release on Friday that is the 12th, PgCon is starts the 16th and there > >>is a weekend in between. If there is an unknown regression or new bug that > >>is severe, are we going to have the resources to resolve it? > > > >ISTM if that happens, we're no worse off than currently. > > Technically sure, reputation? Well, reputation-wise we're already losing every time somebody's server crashes on 9.4.2 and finds it won't start, where it did start fine with 9.4.1. Maybe they simply wanted to change shared_buffers and the server won't start anymore. Some people even update binaries with the server running; if they don't restart immediately, it could be several days before it fails to start. It's pretty scary. > If we really want to do this, let's do it. I am not trying to throw a wrench > into things. I just really don't want to have to go back, yet again. Sure, me neither. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: