Re: Run pgindent now?
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Run pgindent now? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20150527155359.GA31835@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Run pgindent now? (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Run pgindent now?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 02:31:07AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote: > But really, the typedef list is the minor part what annoys me about > pgindent. That it completely butchers so many constructs (e.g. function > pointer typedefs, inline asm as extreme examples) is much worse. It's > also neigh on impossible to predict/keep the indentation pgindent will > use in many cases. Having to try to write code in a way that doesn't > break the re-indentation tool, even if it'd otherwise be fine, is just > absurd. What does "break" mean here? Considering we are indenting 1.4M lines of code, skipping ASM files seems pretty minor. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: