Re: Triggers on transaction?
От | hubert depesz lubaczewski |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Triggers on transaction? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20150527110717.GB4853@depesz.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Triggers on transaction? (Jordan Gigov <coladict@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Triggers on transaction?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 01:55:24PM +0300, Jordan Gigov wrote: > Updating a materialized view in my case. It should only update when 2-3 of > our 30+ tables get new data, which for those is kind of rare. Not having > such a trigger means I will have to call it in each usage in the code and > hope future maintainers don't forget it. This is why I postponed migrating > the one search query where materialized views would be useful, because it's > heavy. Add daemon which runs "LISTEN", and triggers on the underlying tables that do NOTIFY. When daemon picks something from LISTEN (which happens only after commit) - it can do anything that needs to be done, and it will not block the transaction, which is an added benefit. depesz
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: