Re: brin regression test intermittent failures
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: brin regression test intermittent failures |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20150526143002.GS5885@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: brin regression test intermittent failures (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: brin regression test intermittent failures
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> writes: > > I meant to get around to looking into it, but FWIW I see BRIN-related > > Valgrind issues. e.g.: > > Fixed, see 79f2b5d583e2e2a7; but AFAICS this has no real-world impact > so it does not explain whatever is happening on chipmunk. Ah, thanks for diagnosing that. The chipmunk failure is strange -- notice it only references the = operators, except for type box for which it's ~= that fails. The test includes a lot of operators ... Also, we have quite a number of ARM boxes: apart from chipmunk we have gull, hamster, mereswine, dangomushi, axolotl, grison. (hamster and chipmunk report hostname -m as "armv6l", the others armv7l). All of them are running Linux, either Fedora or Debian. Most are using gcc, compilation flags look pretty standard. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: