Re: fsync-pgdata-on-recovery tries to write to more files than previously
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: fsync-pgdata-on-recovery tries to write to more files than previously |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20150525175218.GQ26667@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: fsync-pgdata-on-recovery tries to write to more files than previously (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: fsync-pgdata-on-recovery tries to write to more files than previously
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Andres Freund (andres@anarazel.de) wrote: > On 2015-05-25 13:38:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > > > On May 24, 2015 7:52:53 AM PDT, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > If we'd merge it with initdb's list I think I'd not be that bad. I'm thinking of some header declaring it, roughlylike the rmgr list. > > > > pg_log/ is a counterexample to that idea too; initdb doesn't know about it > > (and shouldn't). > > The idea would be to *only* directories that initdb knows about. Since > that's where the valuables are. So I don't see how pg_log would be a > counterexample. Indeed, that wouldn't be included in the list of things to fsync and it isn't listed in initdb, so that works. I've not followed this thread all that closely, but I do tend to agree with the idea of "only try to mess with files that are *clearly* ours to mess with." Thanks! Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: