Re: a few thoughts on the schedule

On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 09:15:14AM -0400, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 20 May 2015 at 03:13, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> > Brief committer appraisals are unhelpful individually, but patterns
> > matter.  I
> > would make the questionnaire as simple as necessary to get 4-7 committer
> > evaluations per patch.  Prefer 30-second analyses from each of five
> > committers, not 30-minute analyses from two.

> I'm happy to participate as a "triager" and will follow whatever process we
> decide.
> 
> I would very much like to make this something we do via the CF app.

Good place for it.

> I believe we should include in our thinking how we nurture and grow
> reviewers, contributors and committers. I am more likely to treat a
> low-value patch seriously if it is an early contribution from someone, for
> example.

Absolutely, though I am unsure how to specifically account for that in
community processes.