Re: feature freeze and beta schedule

On 2015-05-01 18:37:23 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> * Multivariate statistics
>   This is not intended to be committed this CF.
>   => I'd like to mark this as returned with (little) feedback.
>
> * Avoiding plan disasters with LIMIT
>   I'm not enthused by the approach, it's disabled by default though. So
>   it might not be too bad to just do it. Would probably have been a good
>   idea to discuss the patch in a separate thread.
>   => ?
>
> * Turning off HOT for larger SQL queries
>   Seems to have degenerated into a discussion of not really related
>   things. I personally would vote for committing something close to what
>   Simon proposed last *directly at the beginning* of the next cycle.
>   => Move?

> * Unique Joins
>   This seems to require more work and came in pretty late
>   => Returned with feedback.
>
> * INNER JOIN removals
>   Seem far to controversial to consider comitting in 9.5.
>   => Returned (or even rejected :()

> * Async execution of postgres_fdw.
>   Later iterations of the patch haven't gotten much review yet. The
>   original version of the patch is just from 2014-12-15.
>   => Should imo be moved to the next CF

> 
> * Allow "snapshot too old" error, to prevent bloat
>   http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1361166406.1897609.1424371443904.JavaMail.yahoo%40mail.yahoo.com
>   talked about a new version that afaics never materialized
>   => Returned with feedback

> * Parallel Seq scan
>   In my opinion the topic has progressed greatly. But at the same time
>   it doesn't seem like it's in a state we should consider for 9.5.
>   => Return?

> * logical column ordering (WIP)
>   This pretty clearly isn't 9.5 material.
>   => Return

> * Support ORDER BY in CREATE FUNCTION for Set Returning Functions
>   Uhm. I think the outcome of the discussion so far wasn't really
>   favorable to the idea s proposed.
>   => Rejected

Marked as such.