Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20150508183504.GU12950@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0
Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-05-08 14:30:46 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Maybe just hold an open transaction in another session while you do what > the regression test does? I think this is probably not a matter of CCA > per se but just timing. It's unfortunate that the test in question is > run serially without other transactions occurring concurrently, as that > would likely have exposed the problem far sooner. I think Peter (on IM) just found a more likely explanation than mine. index_close(idxRel, NoLock); heap_close(relation, NoLock); candidates = lappend_oid(candidates, idxForm->indexrelid); ... Yes. idxForm points into idxRel->rd_index. He's working on a fix for both this and removal of the still unnecessary indcheckxmin check. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: