Re: Disabling trust/ident authentication configure option
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Disabling trust/ident authentication configure option |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20150506144724.GU2523@alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Disabling trust/ident authentication configure option (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Disabling trust/ident authentication configure option
Re: Disabling trust/ident authentication configure option |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote: > I frankly find that a bit difficult to swallow. You think that > everyone knows that bad passwords are a problem, but some people might > not realize that an authentication method called "trust" might not be > secure? Ultimately, what we offer to users is choice of a few options. Should we only offer options that we consider to be completely secure, and no others? If we were to follow that principle, we would completely disable non-SSL builds, and all auth methods other than, I dunno, GSSAPI and such. But we don't do that, because we trust that users will use whatever is most appropriate for them. I see this patch is, in a way, a mechanism to let system administrators choose at compile time what options are available to DBAs at setup time. This seems a reasonable thing to me. I don't necessarily agree with the patch as proposed. I would rather have a comma-separated list of methods, as in: --disable-auth=ident,peer which lets you choose what to disable without hardcoded choices. Due to the nature of autoconf, this might be too fiddly to implement, though, and if so I think the method proposed by this patch seems a reasonable compromise. I've seen configure in other programs offer options such as --disable-foo=list that lists acceptable values (or --disable-foo=help) -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: