Re: How about to have relnamespace and relrole?

I sent the previous mail unfinished.

At Thu, 09 Apr 2015 17:25:10 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote in
<20150409.172510.29010318.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> Hello, sorry for the absence. I changed the regnamespace's
> behavior as the same as the other reg* types. And I attached a
> patch as separate one that fixes regroleout to do the same as the
> other reg* types, because I have

because, I doubt that it is appropriate way to do so.

> 0001-Add-regrole_v6.patch : fix regnamespace to behave as the
>     same as the other reg* types.
> 
> 0001-Make-regnamespace-behave-as-the-same-as-other-reg-ty.patch:
>   Diff from v5 to v6, only for convinience.
> 
> 0001-Fix-regroleout-s-behavior-following-other-out-functi.patch:
>   Fixes regroleout so as to behave as the same as other reg*
>   types, but might be a bit too large.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center