Re: BUG #8470: 9.3 locking/subtransaction performance regression

On Mon, Jan  5, 2015 at 02:23:18PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I just got around to merging this patch to 9.5 sources.  I'm glad I
> did it because in the course of doing so I noticed a bug in a recent
> patch, which led to commit d5e3d1e969d2f65009f718d3100d6565f47f9112
> (back-patched to 9.3).
>
> I'm now more confident in this code and will probably push this a few
> days, but only to 9.5 at least for now.  It probably won't apply cleanly
> to 9.3 due to other changes in the area, such as 05315498012530d44cd89a2
> and df630b0dd5ea2de52972d456f5978a012436115e and others.

Where are we on this?

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +