Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20150318172653.GN27420@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit
Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-03-18 13:12:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Indeed. In this case, since the patch in question is one that > improves/simplifies a patch that's already in the current commitfest, > I'm going to go ahead and push it. If you want to call a vote on > revoking my commit bit, go right ahead. Seriously? In my opinion it has to be possible to doubt whether a patch should be committed in certain release without it being interpreted as a personal attack. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: