Re: Version on the yum.postgresql.org website
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Version on the yum.postgresql.org website |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20150318163051.GB13998@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Version on the yum.postgresql.org website (John Scalia <jayknowsunix@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:21:37PM -0400, John Scalia wrote: > On 3/18/2015 12:17 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:06:58PM -0400, John Scalia wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I'm not sure of policy on the yum.postgresql.org website, but I have a small difficulty. We haven't yet upgraded beyond9.3.3, and that's been working fairly well for us. For an > >> upcoming project, we need to build out a new environment from scratch, which means being able to download everythingfrom either the RedHat yum sites or from 3rd party yum sites. > >> Well, the older 9.3.3 version isn't on the postgresql site anymore. Now 9.3.4 and above are, but that means a wholenew and time-consuming round of testing if we migrate up. Is > >> there any chance of putting the older 9.3.3 instance back on the yum site? Or is some major flaw with 9.3.3 that shouldmotivate us to get off it immediately? > > I think you need to read this, and do all minor upgrades when they are > > available: > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/ > > > > The community considers not upgrading to be riskier than > > upgrading. > Sure, I read this earlier, but if this is really the issue, then why are 9.3.4 and 9.3.5 both still available on the yumsite? Isn't that also a sort of violation since the current > version of 9.3 is 9.3.6? I don't know. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: