Re: New CF app deployment

On Tue, Mar  3, 2015 at 10:58:28AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Would you suggest removing the automated system completely, or keep it around
> > and just make it possible to override it (either by removing the note that
> > something is a patch, or by making something that's not listed as a patch
> > become marked as such)?
> 
> One counter-idea would be to assume every attachment is a patch _unless_
> the attachment type matches a pattern that identifies it as not a patch.
> 
> However, I agree with Tom that we should go a little longer before
> changing it.

Also, can we look inside the attachment to see if it starts with
'diff<space>'.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +