Re: pg_upgrade and rsync
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade and rsync |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20150303133850.GA5726@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade and rsync (Vladimir Borodin <root@simply.name>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade and rsync
Re: pg_upgrade and rsync |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:38:58AM +0300, Vladimir Borodin wrote: > No, you would not need to take a full backup if you use these instructions. > > > Although it would be applied to documentation for 9.5 only, are these > instructions applicable for upgrading from 9.3.6 to 9.4.1? Yes. They work all the way back to 9.0. > Following the instructions from patch I’ve got following errors in > postgresql.log of replica after trying to start it with hot_standby = on: > > < 2015-02-24 11:47:22.861 MSK >WARNING: WAL was generated with wal_level= > minimal, data may be missing > < 2015-02-24 11:47:22.861 MSK >HINT: This happens if you temporarily set > wal_level=minimal without taking a new base backup. > < 2015-02-24 11:47:22.861 MSK >FATAL: hot standby is not possible because > wal_level was not set to "hot_standby" or higher on the master server > < 2015-02-24 11:47:22.861 MSK >HINT: Either set wal_level to "hot_standby" on > the master, or turn off hot_standby here. > < 2015-02-24 11:47:22.862 MSK >LOG: startup process (PID 28093) exited with > exit code 1 > < 2015-02-24 11:47:22.862 MSK >LOG: aborting startup due to startup process > failure OK, hmmm. Thanks for testing. It feels like you didn't have your new master set up for streaming replication when you ran pg_upgrade. Is that correct? Should I specify that specifically in the instructions? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: