Re: Providing catalog view to pg_hba.conf file - Patch submission
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Providing catalog view to pg_hba.conf file - Patch submission |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20150227183518.GR29780@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Providing catalog view to pg_hba.conf file - Patch submission (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Tomas Vondra (tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > On 27.2.2015 17:59, Stephen Frost wrote: > > All, > > > > * Tomas Vondra (tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > >> > >> The other feature that'd be cool to have is a debugging function > >> on top of the view, i.e. a function pg_hba_check(host, ip, db, > >> user, pwd) showing which hba rule matched. But that's certainly > >> nontrivial. > > > > I'm not sure that I see why, offhand, it'd be much more than trivial > > ... > > From time to time I have to debug why are connection attempts failing, > and with moderately-sized pg_hba.conf files (e.g. on database servers > shared by multiple applications) that may be tricky. Identifying the > rule that matched (and rejected) the connection would be helpful. To clarify, I was trying to say that writing that function didn't seem very difficult to me. I definitely think that *having* that function would be very useful. > But yes, that's non-trivial and out of scope of this patch. For my 2c, I view this as somewhat up to the author. I wouldn't complain if it was included in a new version of this patch as I don't think it'd add all that much complexity and it'd be very nice, but I certainly think this patch could go in without that too. Thanks! Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: