Re: SSL renegotiation
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SSL renegotiation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20150222130527.GE6093@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | SSL renegotiation (Emil Lenngren <emil.lenngren@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SSL renegotiation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-02-22 01:27:54 +0100, Emil Lenngren wrote: > I honestly wonder why postgres uses renegotiation at all. The motivation > that cryptoanalysis is easier as more data is sent seems quite > far-fetched. I don't think so. There's a fair number of algorithms that can/could be much easier be attached with lots of data available. Especially if you can guess/know/control some of the data. Additionally renegotiating regularly helps to constrain a possible key leagage to a certain amount of time. With backend connections often being alive for weeks at a time that's not a bad thing. And it's not just us. E.g. openssh also triggers renegotiations based on the amount of data sent. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: