Re: BUG #12779: pg_dump -Fd doesn't care about -Z
От | Christoph Berg |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #12779: pg_dump -Fd doesn't care about -Z |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20150217155449.GA21057@msg.df7cb.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #12779: pg_dump -Fd doesn't care about -Z (christoph.berg@credativ.de) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #12779: pg_dump -Fd doesn't care about -Z
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Re: To pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org 2015-02-17 <20150217153446.2590.24945@wrigleys.postgresql.org> > 1164 1.fd > 1164 9.fd > > 1488 1.fc > 1160 9.fc Re: Francisco Olarte 2015-02-17 <CA+bJJbza-+UOuofSVCoHdn6kMa3u4zWzgKZhyU=Qab46R4vY-w@mail.gmail.com> > > pg_dump -Fd doesn't seem to care about -Z for Z > 0: > > > > With such a small dump, are you sure du's block granularity is not masking > the differences in -Fd ? ( Have you tried du -b, or just comparing every > size ?) ( In -Fc it is a single file, harder to mask ). I noticed when trying to compress an assumed-to-be-Z4 file a bit more using -Z7. The directory was 241GB in both cases. And if you compare with -Fc, the difference is a lot more than a few FS blocks. Christoph -- cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: