Re: pg_upgrade failure on Windows Server
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade failure on Windows Server |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20150122162657.GC7148@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade failure on Windows Server (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade failure on Windows Server
Re: pg_upgrade failure on Windows Server |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 2015-01-22 11:24:31 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:01:39AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > > The > > > Windows-specif code we do carry is required and was developed by people > > > that are no longer as involved. > > > > > > > I have seen many a times that once committer's (those who are not generally > > involved in Windows development) get reasonable confidence about patch > > and the review done for the same, they commit the patch. It happens both > > for the patches where I was Author and where I was Reviewer, although I > > agree that it takes more time. > > Here is Windows change to properly detach the server process that never > got implemented as no Windows expert developed or tested a patch, but > test code was posted: > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/53759381.4000205@cubiclesoft.com#53759381.4000205@cubiclesoft.com > > Here is another unapplied Windows patch for preventing Control-C from > closing the server: > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20140410214426.GI6917@momjian.us#20140410214426.GI6917@momjian.us > > Again, I would love to say we handle Windows patches well, but we don't. I unfortunately don't the issue is that specific to windows. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: